Long-term treatment outcomes of complicated acute diverticulitis in immunocompromised patients.

Fecha de publicación: 04/11/2024

Autores de IIS La Fe

Jorge Sancho Muriel

Autor
Hanna Barbara Cholewa

Autor
Mónica Millán Scheiding

Autor
Francisco Giner Segura

Autor
Vicent Primo I Romaguera

Autor
Matteo Frasson

Autor
Blas Flor Lorente

Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

Quevedo, David
Alvarez, Eduardo
Nieto-Sanchez, Marta
Blasco, Raquel
Gomez, Maria Jose

Grupos

Cirugía digestiva y Cuidados perioperatorios

Leader

Matteo Frasson

Abstract

PURPOSE: The main aim of this study was to determine the short- and long-term outcomes of the non-operative management of acute left-sided complicated diverticulitis (ALCD) in severely immunocompromised patients (IMS group) and compare them with immunocompetent patients (IC group). The secondary aim was to assess the necessity of an elective surgery following a successful prior non-operative management in the IMS group after a non-operative management of the first episode of ALCD. METHODS: Patients presented with their first episode of ALCD between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Only severely immunosuppressed patients were considered for the analysis, including the following: long-term oral or intravenous steroid intake, current malignancy undergoing chemotherapy, chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis, or solid organ transplant with immunosuppressive medication. For each group, demographic data, severity of the episode, management decisions (conservative or operative), and short- and long-term outcomes were recorded and compared. A sub-analysis of patients with ALCD associating and abscess (modified Hinchey classification Ib/II) was performed. RESULTS: A total of 290 patients were included in the study: 50 among the IMS and 240 among the IC group. The rate of emergent surgery was higher in the IMS group (50.0% vs. 22.5%, p<0.001) and was associated with increased morbidity (72.4% vs. 50.0%, p=0.041) and mortality (24.1% vs. 4.3%, p=0.003). The duration of the hospital stay was significantly longer in the IMS group (15 vs. 8days, p<0.001). The final stoma rate was significantly higher in the IMS group (82.1% vs. 22.9, p<0.001), with a median follow-up of 51.4months. A total of 141 patients presented ALCD with an abscess; 25 in the IMS and 116 in the IC group. There was a higher rate of surgical intervention among the IMS group as the initial treatment approach (24.0% vs. 5.2%, p=0.002), even though the conservative treatment had a similar rate of success (81.3% vs. 92.0%, p=0.178). The recurrence rate following a non-operative approach was similar (IMS: 31.2% vs. 35.4% in the IC group, p=0.169). Furthermore, 81.2% of non-operatively managed IMS patients (13 out of 16) did not require a surgical intervention at the end of the follow-up, with similar findings in the IC group (78/96, 81.2%, p=0.148). CONCLUSION: Medical treatment of immunosuppressed patients during their first ALCD episode associated with an abscess is feasible, with a high success rate and results comparable with the IC group. Moreover, taking into account the readmission rates, the need for emergent surgery of the recurrence, and the perioperative mortality and morbidity in the IMS group, conservative management with no differed scheduled surgery seems to be a safe option in this subgroup of patients.