Role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas in the CART era.

Fecha de publicación: Fecha Ahead of Print:

Autores de IIS La Fe

  • Rafael Hernani Morales

    Autor

  • Gloria Iacoboni Garcia-Calvo

    Autor

  • Joan Antoni Teixidor Sureda

    Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

  • Mussetti, Alberto
  • Bento, Leyre
  • Bastos-Oreiro, Mariana
  • Rius Sansalvador, B.
  • Albo, Carmen
  • Bailen, Rebeca
  • Barba, Pere
  • Benzaquen, Ana
  • Briones, Javier
  • Caballero AC
  • Campos, Antonio
  • Espanol, Ignacio
  • Ferra, Christelle
  • López SG
  • Gonzalez Sierra, Pedro Antonio
  • Guerra LM
  • Jiminez Ubieto, Ana Isabel
  • Kwon, Mi
  • Corral LL
  • Lopez-Godino, Oriana
  • Munoz, Maria Carmen Martinez
  • Martinez-Cibrian, Nuria
  • Gómez JM
  • Perez-Ortega, Laura
  • Orti, Guillermo
  • Ortiz-Maldonado, Valentin
  • Pascual, Maria-Jesus
  • Perera, Maria
  • Perez, Antonio
  • Reguera JL
  • Sanchez, Jose M.
  • Torrent, Anna
  • Yanez, Lucrecia
  • Varela, Rosario
  • Echechipia IC
  • Caballero, Dolores

Grupos

Abstract

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) has rapidly been adopted as the standard third-line therapy to treat aggressive B-cell lymphomas (ABCL) after failure of second-line therapy despite the lack of direct comparisons with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT)-based strategies. Using the Grupo Espanol de Trasplante y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) registry, we selected patients with the following characteristics: CART or alloHCT performed between 2016 and 2021; =18 years old; ABCL diagnosis; =2 lines of therapy; and either anti-CD19 CART or alloHCT as therapy at relapse. The analysis included a total of 316 (CART=215, alloHCT=101) patients. Median follow-up was 15 and 36 months for the CART and alloHCT cohorts, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, CART was confirmed to be similar to alloHCT for the primary study endpoint (progression-free survival) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, CI95%:0.56-1.51, p=0.75). Furthermore, when the analysis was limited to only patients with chemo-sensitive diseases (complete and partial response) at infusion (CART=26, alloHCT=93), no differences were reported (progression-free survival at month +18: 65% versus 55%, p=0.59). However, CART had lower non-relapse mortality (HR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.85, p=0.02). Given the lower toxicity and similar survival outcomes, these results suggest the use of CART before alloHCT.

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Datos de la publicación

ISSN/ISSNe:
0268-3369, 1476-5365

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION  SPRINGERNATURE

Tipo:
Article
Páginas:
673-679
PubMed:
36918682
Enlace a otro recurso:
www.scopus.com
Factor de Impacto:
0,998 SCImago
Cuartil:
Q2 SCImago

Citas Recibidas en Web of Science: 12

Citas Recibidas en Scopus: 10

Documentos

  • No hay documentos

Métricas

Filiaciones mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • T-CELLS; RECOMMENDATIONS; OUTCOMES; BLOOD

Cita

Compartir