Estimation of the difference between peritoneal microenvironment and core body temperature during laparoscopic surgery - a prospective observational study

Fecha de publicación: 02/09/2024

Autores de IIS La Fe

• Guido Mazzinari

  Autor

• Blas Flor Lorente

  Autor

• María Pilar Argente Navarro

  Autor

• 

  Óscar Díaz Cambronero

  Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

• Rovira, Lucas
• Vila Montanes, Maria
• Garcia Gregorio, Nuria
• Ayas Montero, Begona
• Alberola Estelles, Maria Jose

Grupos

• Cirugía digestiva y Cuidados perioperatorios

  

  Leader

  Matteo Frasson

• Medicina Perioperatoria, Anestesiología y Reanimación

  

  Leader

  Óscar Díaz Cambronero

Abstract

Maintaining patients' temperature during surgery is beneficial since hypothermia has been linked with perioperative complications. Laparoscopic surgery involves the insufflation of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the peritoneal cavity and has become the standard in many surgical indications since it is associated with better and faster recovery. However, the use of cold and dry CO2 insufflation can lead to perioperative hypothermia. We aimed to assess the difference between intraperitoneal and core temperatures during laparoscopic surgery and evaluate the influence of duration and CO2 insufflation volume by fitting a mixed generalized additive model. In this prospective observational single-center cohort trial, we included patients aged over 17 with American Society of Anesthesiology risk scores I to III undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Anesthesia, ventilation, and analgesia followed standard protocols, while patients received active warming using blankets and warmed fluids. Temperature data, CO2 ventilation parameters, and intraabdominal pressure were collected. We recruited 51 patients. The core temperature was maintained above 36 degrees C and progressively raised toward 37 degrees C as pneumoperitoneum time passed. In contrast, the intraperitoneal temperature decreased, thus creating a widening difference from 0.4 [25th-75th percentile: 0.2-0.8] degrees C at the beginning to 2.3 [2.1-2.3] degrees C after 240 min. Pneumoperitoneum duration and CO2 insufflation volume significantly increased this temperature difference (P < 0.001 for both parameters). Core vs. intraperitoneal temperature difference increased linearly by 0.01 T degrees C per minute of pneumoperitoneum time up to 120 min and then 0.05 T degrees C per minute. Each insufflated liter per unit of time, i.e. every 10 min, increased the temperature difference by approximately 0.009 T degrees C. Our findings highlight the impact of pneumoperitoneum duration and CO2 insufflation volume on the difference between core and intraperitoneal temperatures. Implementing adequate external warming during laparoscopic surgery effectively maintains core temperature despite the use of dry and unwarmed CO2 gases, but peritoneal hypothermia remains a concern, suggesting the importance of further research into regional effects.

Keywords

• Laparoscopic surgery; Perioperative hypothermia; Normothermia; Carbon dioxide; Peritoneum