Enhancing the First-Pass Effect in Acute Stroke: The Impact of Stent Retriever Characteristics

Autores de IIS La Fe

• Fernando Aparici Robles

  Autor

• Lluis Morales Caba

  Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

• Murias, Eduardo
• Puig, Josep
• Serna-Candel, Carmen
• Gonzalez, Eva Maria
• Moreu, Manuel
• Jimenez-Gomez, Elvira
• SanRoman, Luis
• Terceno, Mikel
• Martinez, Antonio Mosqueira
• Aixut, Sonia
• Romero, Veredas
• Mendez, Jose Carlos
• Sagredo-Barra, Antonio
• Aguilar, Yeray
• de Rueda, Mariano Espinosa
• Blazquez, Miguel Angel Castano
• Bashir, Saima
• Castro, Jose Rodriguez
• Lopez-Frias, Alfonso
• Jimenez, Jose Maria
• Chaviano, Juan
• Maestro, Victor
• Manso, Javier
• Lopez-Rueda, Antonio
• Remollo, Sebastia
• Comas-Cufi, Marc
• Vega, Pedro
• Rossetti Registry Investigators

Grupos

• Unidad Mixta de Investigación Cerebrovascular

  Leader

  Juan Bautista Salom Sanvalero

Abstract

Introduction: Although stentrievers (SRs) have been a mainstay of mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and current guidelines recommend the use of SRs in the treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke (LVO), there is a paucity of studies in the literature comparing SRs directly against each other in terms of mechanical and functional properties. Timely access to endovascular therapy and the ability to restore intracranial flow in a safe, efficient, and efficacious manner have been critical to the success of MT. This study aimed to investigate the impact of contemporary SR characteristics, including model, brand, size, and length, on the first-pass effect (FPE) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Consecutive patients with M1 occlusion treated with a single SR+BGC were recruited from the ROSSETTI registry. The primary outcome was the FPE that was defined as modified (mFPE) or true (tFPE) for the achievement of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) grades 2b-3 or 3 after a single device pass, respectively. We compared patients who achieved mFPE with those who achieved tFPE according to SR characteristics. Results: We included 610 patients (52.3% female and 47.7% male, mean age 75.1 +/- 13.62 years). mFPE was achieved in 357 patients (58.5%), whereas tFPE was achieved in 264 (43.3%). There was no significant association between SR characteristics and mFPE or tFPE. Specifically, the SR size did not show a statistically significant relationship with improvement in FPE. Similarly, the length of the SR did not yield significant differences in the mFPE and tFPE, even when the data were grouped. Conclusions: Our data indicate that contemporary SR-mediated thrombectomy characteristics, including model, brand, size, and length, do not significantly affect the FPE.

Keywords

• thrombectomy; stroke; endovascular; stentriever