Location and allocation: inequity of access to liver transplantation for patients with severe acute-on-chronic liver failure in Europe.
Fecha de publicación:
Fecha Ahead of Print:
Autores de IIS La Fe
Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe
- Artzner, Thierry
- Bernal, William
- Belli, Luca S.
- Conti, Sara
- Cortesi, Paolo A.
- Sacleux, Sophie-Caroline
- Pageaux, George-Philippe
- Radenne, Sylvie
- Trebicka, Jonel
- Fernandez, Javier
- Perricone, Giovanni
- Piano, Salvatore
- Nadalin, Silvio
- Morelli, Maria C.
- Martini, Silvia
- Polak, Wojciech G.
- Zieniewicz, Krzysztof
- Toso, Christian
- Iegri, Claudia
- Invernizzi, Federica
- Volpes, Riccardo
- Karam, Vincent
- Adam, Rene
- Faitot, Francois
- Rabinowich, Liane
- Saliba, Faouzi
- Meunier, Lucy
- Lesurtel, Mickael
- Uschner, Frank E.
- Michard, Baptiste
- Coilly, Audrey
- Meszaros, Magdalena
- Poinsot, Domitille
- Besch, Camille
- Schnitzbauer, Andreas
- De Carlis, Luciano G.
- Fumagalli, Roberto
- Angeli, Paolo
- Arroyo, Vincente
- Fondevila, Constantino
- Duvoux, Christophe
- Jalan, Rajiv
- ELITA/EF-CLIF working group
Grupos
Abstract
There is growing evidence that liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment for acute-on-chronic liver failure grade-3 (ACLF-3). This study examines whether and how this evidence translates into practice by analyzing the variability in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, listing strategies, and LT activity for patients with ACLF-3 across transplantation centers in Europe. Consecutive patients who were admitted to the ICU with ACLF-3, whether or not they were listed and/or transplanted with ACLF-3, between 2018 and 2019 were included across 20 transplantation centers. A total of 351 patients with ACLF-3 were included: 33 had been listed prior to developing ACLF-3 and 318 had not been listed at the time of admission to the ICU. There was no correlation between the number of unlisted patients with ACLF-3 admitted to the ICU and the number listed or transplanted while in ACLF-3 across centers. By contrast, there was a correlation between the number of patients listed and the number transplanted while in ACLF-3. About 21% of patients who were listed while in ACLF-3 died on the waiting list or were delisted. The percentage of LT for patients with ACLF-3 varied from 0% to 29% for those transplanted with decompensated cirrhosis across centers (average = 8%), with an I(2) index of 68% (95% confidence interval, 49%-80%), showing substantial heterogeneity among centers. The 1-year survival for all patients with ACLF-3 was significantly higher in centers that listed and transplanted more patients with ACLF-3 (>10 patients) than in centers that listed and transplanted fewer: 36% versus 20%, respectively (p = 0.012). Patients with ACLF-3 face inequity of access to LT across Europe. Waitlisting strategies for patients with ACLF-3 influence their access to LT and, ultimately, their survival.
© 2022 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Datos de la publicación
- ISSN/ISSNe:
- 1527-6465, 1527-6473
- Tipo:
- Article
- Páginas:
- 1429-1440
- DOI:
- 10.1002/lt.26499
- PubMed:
- 35544360
- Factor de Impacto:
- 1,614 SCImago ℠
- Cuartil:
- Q1 SCImago ℠
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Citas Recibidas en Web of Science: 34
Documentos
- No hay documentos
Filiaciones
Keywords
- ILL CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS
Portal de investigación