Hydrodistension plus Onabotulinumtoxin A in bladder pain syndrome refractory to conservative treatments
Autores de IIS La Fe
Grupos
Abstract
Introduction: For bladder pain syndrome (BPS) refractory to conservative treatment, the European guidelines consider bladder hydrodistention (HD) under anaesthesia and the injection of Onabotulinumtoxin A (OnabotA) jointly. The objective of this study was to assess our experience in implementing this technique. Material and methods: A prospective study of 25 patients with BPS who underwent HD plus a submucosal injection of 100 U of OnabotA in trigone. The Hunner lesions were treated endoscopically using resection or electrocoagulation. Thirty-eight procedures were performed (25 first interventions and 13 reoperations). To study the clinical change, we evaluated the subjective improvement (Treatment Benefit Scale [TBS] and Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC] scales), the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the Bladder Pain/Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Score (BPIC-SS) questionnaire and the voiding diary for 3 days. For the data analysis, we employed the Wilcoxon, Kruskal-Wallis, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Results: We observed subjective improvement in 21 patients (84%), which was significant in 47% of these patients, moderate in 41.2% and slight in 11.8%. Four patients did not improve. A post-treatment reduction in the pain VAS (from 7.1 to 1.8 points; P=.001), in daytime (from 11.8 to 7.5; P=.012) and night-time (from 5.9 to 3.6; P=.003) voiding frequency and in the BPIC-SS (from 27.9 to 11.2 points; P=.042). The degree of improvement was not related to age, the presence of bladder lesions or the treatment of relapses. The median duration of improvement was 7 months (95% CI 5.69-8.31), although this duration was somewhat longer for the patients younger than 65 years. Mild complications occurred in 23.7% of the cases. Conclusions: The joint implementation of HD plus OnabotA is a valid therapeutic option in refractory BPS, which provides good clinical results and maintains its effectiveness in retreatments. (C) 2016 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
Datos de la publicación
- ISSN/ISSNe:
- 0210-4806, 1699-7980
- Tipo:
- Article
- Páginas:
- 303-308
- Factor de Impacto:
- 0,436 SCImago ℠
- Cuartil:
- Q2 SCImago ℠
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS ENE EDICIONES SL
Citas Recibidas en Web of Science: 4
Documentos
- No hay documentos
Filiaciones
Keywords
- Bladder pain syndrome; Interstitial cystitis; Onabotulinumtoxin A; Hydrodistention; Hunner's lesion
Proyectos asociados
PROSPET. DISPOSITIVO MULTI-IMAGEN CON UN DETECTOR PET PARA GUIAR LA BIOPSIA, EL TRATAMIENTO Y EL SEGUIMIENTO DEL CÁNCER DE PRÓSTATA.
Investigador Principal: CÉSAR DAVID VERA DONOSO
DTS15/00044 . INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III . 2016
ESTUDIO DE EVALUACION DE LA FACTIVILIDAD, VALIDEZ Y FIABILIDAD DEL DIARIO MICCIONAL DE 3 DIAS, EN MUJERES ATENDIDAS EN UNIDADES DE UROLOGIA FUNCIONAL Y URODINAMICA. ESTUDIO DM3D.
Investigador Principal: SALVADOR ARLANDIS GUZMÁN
VH01-10 . 2011
ESTUDIO SOBRE PRÁCTICA CLÍNICA HABITUAL EN PACIENTES CON SÍNDROME DE DOLOR VESICAL (SDV) EN UNIDADES DE UROLOGÍA FUNCIONAL Y URODINÁMICA.
Investigador Principal: SALVADOR ARLANDIS GUZMÁN
AST-URO-13-02 . 2014
ESTUDIO DE EVALUACION DE LA VEJIGA HIPERACTIVA Y HIPERACTIVIDAD DEL DETRUSOR EN VARONES CON SINTOMAS DEL TRACTO URINARIO INFERIOR (STUI) DE LLENADO QUE ACUDEN A UNIDADES DE UROLOGIA FUNCIONAL Y URODINAMICA.
Investigador Principal: SALVADOR ARLANDIS GUZMÁN
VH02-11 . 2011
ESTUDIO ALEATORIZADO, DOBLE CIEGO, DE GRUPOS PARALELOS, CONTROL ACTIVO Y MULTICÉNTRICO PARA LA EVALUACIÓN DE LA SEGURIDAD Y LA EFICACIA A LARGO PLAZO DE LA COMBINACIÓN DE SUCCINATO DE SOLIFENACINA CON MIRABEGRON EN COMPARACIÓN CON MONOTERAPIAS DE SUCCINAT O DE SOLIFENACINA Y DE MIRABEGRON EN SUJETOS CON VEJIGA HIPERACTIVA.
Investigador Principal: SALVADOR ARLANDIS GUZMÁN
178-CL-102 . 2015
Cita
Lorenzo L,Bonillo MA,Arlandis S,Martinez E,Marzullo L,Broseta E,Boronat F. Hydrodistension plus Onabotulinumtoxin A in bladder pain syndrome refractory to conservative treatments. Actas Urol Esp. 2016. 40. (5):p. 303-308. IF:1,181. (4).