A survey to medical residents on the performance of diagnostic and therapeutic thoracenteses: a training gap?

Autores de IIS La Fe

• Enrique Cases Viedma

  Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

• Porcel, JM
• Bielsa, S

Grupos

• Infecciones Respiratorias

  Investigador Principal

  Raúl Méndez Ocaña

Abstract

Objective: Pleural fluid aspiration is a routine procedure for pulmonologists and internists. Our aim was to evaluate technical and methodological aspects of diagnostic and therapeutic thoracenteses performed by last two-year residents of Pulmonology and Internal Medicine. Methods: An online 24-item questionnaire was sent to participants, and responses were evaluated according to the medical specialty. Results: The survey was completed by 139 (17.1%) residents (71 internists and 68 pulmonologists). 29.5% and 41% performed one or no diagnostic or therapeutic thoracenteses monthly, respectively. Only 44% used ultrasonography to guide pleural procedures. Less than half of respondents used local anesthesia for diagnostic aspirations. Contrary to current recommendations, 25% of residents employed intramuscular needles for therapeutic aspirations. More than 80% of residents routinely ordered pleural fluid cultures and cytological studies, regardless of the clinical suspicion. About 40% requested imaging studies after a diagnostic thoracentesis. Half or more of the respondents were unaware of pH measurement methodologies, culture type for mycobacteria, and performance of cell blocks. Pulmonologists were more experienced than internists, and also made use of ultrasonography more frequently. Conclusion: This survey highlights gaps of knowledge and skills in conducting diagnostic and therapeutic thoracenteses. (C) 2016 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. and Sociedad Espanola de Medicina Interna (SEMI). All rights reserved.

Keywords

• Thoracentesis; Pleural effusion; Pleural fluid