Megestrol acetate for cachexia-anorexia syndrome. A systematic review

Fecha de publicación:

Autores de IIS La Fe

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

  • Carbonell-Sanchis, R
  • Bort-Marti, S
  • Gonzalvez-Perales, JL

Grupos

Abstract

In 1993, megestrol acetate (MA) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of anorexia, cachexia, or unexplained weight loss in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. The mechanism by which MA increases appetite is unknown, and its effectiveness for anorexia and cachexia in neoplastic, elderly, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients is under investigation. This is an updated version of a Cochrane systematic review first published in 2005 and later updated in 2013 entitled 'Megestrol acetate for the treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome'. MA vs. placebo: in studies where MA was compared with placebo, the overall results showed that MA patients gained weight (mean difference, MD 2.25 kg, 95% CI [1.19, 3.3]) but did not gain quality of life (QOL) (standarized mean difference, SMD 0.5, 95% CI [-0.13, 1.13]), with more adverse events (relative risk, RR 1.46, 95% CI [1.05, 2.04]), but no difference in deaths (RR 1.26, 95% CI [0.70, 2.27]). MA vs. no treatment: MA patients gained weight (MD 1.45 kg, 95% CI [0.15, 2.75]) but did not gain QOL (standardized mean difference 3.89 95% CI [-14, 6.28]). There was no increase in adverse events (RR 0.90, 95% CI [0.39, 2.08]) or deaths (RR 1.01, 95% CI [0.42, 2.45]). MA vs. active drugs: MA patients gained weight (MD 2.5 kg, 95% CI [0.37, 4.64]) but did not gain QOL (MD 0.20 95% CI [-0.02, 0.43]) and did not report an increase in adverse events (RR 1.05 95% CI [0.95, 1.16]) or in deaths (RR 1.53, 95% CI [1.02, 2.29]) Different doses of MA: in studies where lower doses of MA were compared with higher doses of MA, we did not find differences either in weight gain (MD -0.94 kg, 95% CI [-3.33, 1.45]), QOL (MD 0.31 95% CI [-0.19, 0.81]), or adverse events (RR 1.34, 95% CI [0.65, 2.76]). Thus, we cannot reach a conclusion for an optimal dose of MA.

Datos de la publicación

ISSN/ISSNe:
2190-5991, 2190-6009

Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle  WILEY

Tipo:
Review
Páginas:
444-452
PubMed:
29542279
Factor de Impacto:
2,243 SCImago
Cuartil:
Q1 SCImago

Citas Recibidas en Web of Science: 44

Documentos

  • No hay documentos

Métricas

Filiaciones mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • Anorexia; Appetite Stimulants; Cachexia; Systematic Review; Megestrol Acetate; Randomized Controlled Trials

Proyectos y Estudios Clínicos

APLICACIÓN DE LA NANOTECNOLOGÍA AL TRATAMIENTO DE RETINOSIS PIGMENTARIA CON ANTICUERPOS ANTI_TNF ALFA. EFECTO SINÉRGICO CON ANTIOXIDANTES

Investigador Principal: REGINA RODRIGO NICOLÁS

PI15/00052 . INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III . 2016

RED DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SERVICIOS DE SALUD EN ENFERMEDADES CRÓNICAS-REDISSEC.

Investigador Principal: VICENTE RUIZ GARCÍA

RD16/0001/0019 . INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III . 2017

PHARMAPACKSAFE. DESARROLLO DE ENVASES PLÁSTICOS INERTES Y ESTABLES QUE CONTENDRÁN COLIRIOS PARA USO EN FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA

Investigador Principal: EDUARDO LÓPEZ BRIZ

RTC-2016-5215-1-P03 . MINISTERIO DE CIENCIA E INNOVACION; MINISTERIO DE ECONOMIA Y COMPETITIVIDAD . 2016

PARACETAMOL VERSUS IBUPROFENO EN RECIÉN NACIDOS PREMATUROS CON DIAGNÓSTICO DE DUCTUS ARTERIOSO PERSISTENTE HEMODINÁMICAMENTE SIGNIFICATIVO: ENSAYO CLÍNICO ALEATORIZADO.

Investigador Principal: MARTA AGUAR CARRASCOSA

IBUPAR-TRIAL . 2017

Cita

Compartir