European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Inferior vena cava filters

Fecha de publicación:

Autores de IIS La Fe

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

  • Mismetti, P
  • Afshari, A
  • ESA VTE Guidelines Task Force

Grupos

Abstract

The indications for the use of an inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) in the context of deep venous thrombosis to prevent pulmonary embolism remain controversial. Despite wide use in clinical practice, great variation exists in national and international guidelines in regard to the indications. In addition, clinical practice is based on poor-quality data from trauma and bariatric surgery with a high incidence of complications. It is often difficult to assess their efficacy and lack of filter retrieval appears to be a substantial issue compared with a potential benefit by insertion of these devices. Complications usually refer to increased risk of deep venous thrombosis, filter perforation, filter penetration, filter migration, inferior vena cava occlusion and subsequently failure in pulmonary embolism prevention. Evidence from low-quality studies or registries, with small numbers of patients and conflicting findings, does not allow for a strong recommendation for or against the use of IVCFs. IVCFs should only be considered in cases of very high risk of pulmonary embolism and in perioperative situations at very high risk of bleeding, resulting in a prolonged contra-indication to pharmacological prophylaxis.

Datos de la publicación

ISSN/ISSNe:
0265-0215, 1365-2346

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY  LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS

Tipo:
Article
Páginas:
108-111
PubMed:
29112551
Factor de Impacto:
1,287 SCImago
Cuartil:
Q1 SCImago

Citas Recibidas en Web of Science: 15

Documentos

  • No hay documentos

Métricas

Filiaciones mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • BARIATRIC-SURGERY; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; HIGH-RISK; TRAUMA PATIENTS; ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY; GASTRIC BYPASS; PLACEMENT; PREVENTION; THROMBOSIS; MANAGEMENT

Compartir