Partial versus complete removal of the infected mesh after abdominal wall hernia repair

Autores de IIS La Fe

• José Bueno Lledó

  Autor

• Omar Carreño Saenz

  Autor

• Fernando Carbonell Tatay

  Autor

• Pablo Padilla Iserte

  Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

• Torregrosa-Gallud, A
• Garcia-Pastor, P
• Bonafe-Diana, S

Abstract

Background: To compare the results with complete mesh removal (CMR) versus partial mesh removal (PMR) in the treatment of mesh infection after abdominal wall hernia repair (AWHR). Methods: Retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgery for mesh infection between January 2004 and May 2014 at a tertiary center. Results: Of 3470 cases of AWHR, we reported 66 cases (1.9%) of mesh infection, and 48 repairs (72.7%) required mesh explantation. CMR was achieved on 38 occasions, while PMR was undertaken ten times. We observed more postoperative complications in CMR than PMR group (p = 0.04). Three patients with intestinal fistula were reoperated in postoperative period after a difficult mesh removal; one of them died due to multiple organ failure. The overall recurrence rate after explantation was 47.9%: recurrence was more frequent in CMR group (p = 0.001), although persistent or new mesh infection was observed more frequently with PMR (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Although PMR has less postoperative morbidity, shorter duration of hospitalization and lower rate of recurrence than CMR, prosthetic infection persists in up to 50% of cases. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

• Mesh infection; Mesh explantation; Abdominal wall hernia; Hernia repair