Characteristics and technical survival of home hemodialysis in the Valencian Community (1976–2020);

Autores de IIS La Fe

• Amparo Soldevila Orient

  Autor

• Pilar Sanchez Perez

  Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

• Pérez Alba A.
• Muñoz de Bustillo E.
• Reque Santiváñez J.
• García Peris B.

Abstract

Introduction: Home hemodialysis (HDD) is implemented in the Valencian Community with a higher prevalence than to the rest of the national territory, with a prevalence of 13.4 patients pmp in December 2018. We carried out an assessment of the patients characteristics and the overall and technical survival in HDD depending on the historical moment of onset and its origin. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective and descriptive study including patients of the Valencian Registry of Renal Patients from the beginning of data reported until December 2020. We calculated overall survival (combined event death-technical failure, censoring transplantation) and technical survival (event technical failure, censoring exitus and transplantation). Comparing technical survival according to the starting era: ancient (1976-2000) vs modern (2001-2020) and according to the modality of origin. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression in the total series for both overall and technical survival. Results: 236 patients on HDD (611.4 patient-years of follow-up), mean age 49.7 ± 16.3 years; median time of prior renal replacement therapy 0.2 years. The ratio of transplantation, death, and technical failure were 13.2, 4.4, and 7 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. In the comparison by ancient (n = 57) vs modern (n = 179) eras, age (37.5 vs 53.5 years), DM (3.5 vs 13.4%) and chronic tubuleinterstitial nephropathy (24.6 vs 8.9%) as a cause of chronic kidney disease were statistically significant. The probability of coming from outpatient consultation (33.3 vs 48.6%) and peritoneal dialysis (1.8 vs 12.8%) were higher in modern era with statistical significance. In the ancient era a single hospital centralized 57.9% of the patients, and in the modern era between two hospitals centralized 55.8% of the patients. Overall survival in the ancient era was 83.7% at 1 year, 77.4% at 2 years, and 61% at 5 years; and in the modern era 87.3% per year, 83% 2 years and 47.8% 5 years (Log Rank 0.521). Technical survival in the ancient era was 85.4% at 1 year, 79% 2 years, and 64.1% 5 years; and in the modern era 91.4% per year, 88.5% 2 years and 74.5% 5 years (Log Rank 0.195). There were no statistical differences in the comparison based on technical of provenance. In the Cox regression it was statistically significant for overall survival: the age and being diagnosed with heart disease, vascular disease or active neoplasia and for technical survival liver disease or social problem, both in univariate and multivariate. Conclusions: In the modern era there is a considerable increase in HDD patients in the Valencian Community. There was a center effect in the development of HDD programs, most of the patients depended on few healthcare centers. The patients were older and had greater comorbidity in the modern era, despite this without affecting the technical and overall survival of the HDD. © 2021 Sociedad Española de Nefrología

Keywords

• adult; Article; chronic kidney failure; consultation; death; diabetic nephropathy; female; follow up; glomerulonephritis; heart disease; home dialysis; human; hypertension; interstitial nephritis; kidney polycystic disease; kidney transplantation; liver disease; liver polycystic disease; major clinical study; male; neoplasm; outpatient care; overall survival; peritoneal dialysis; proportional hazards model; register; retrospective study; social problem; Spain; systemic disease; univariate analysis; vascular disease