Cost-Utility of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes in Spain.

Autores de IIS La Fe

• Juan Francisco Merino Torres

  Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

• Ilham S
• Alshannaq H
• Pollock RF
• Ahmed W
• Norman GJ

Grupos

• Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Dietética clínica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Management of advanced type 2 diabetes (T2D) typically involves daily insulin therapy alongside frequent blood glucose monitoring, as treatments such as oral antidiabetic agents are therapeutically insufficient. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) has been shown to facilitate greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and improvements in patient satisfaction relative to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). This study aimed to investigate the cost-utility of rt-CGM versus SMBG in Spanish patients with insulin-treated T2D.. METHODS: The analysis was conducted using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (CDM V9.5). Baseline characteristics of the simulated patient cohort and treatment efficacy data were sourced from a large-scale, United States-based retrospective cohort study. Costs were obtained from Spanish sources and inflated to 2022 Euros (EUR) where required. A remaining lifetime horizon (maximum 50 years) was used, alongside an annual discount rate of 3% for future costs and health effects. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of EUR 30,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was adopted, based on precedent across previous cost-effectiveness studies set in Spain. A Spanish payer perspective was adopted. RESULTS: Over patient lifetimes, rt-CGM yielded 9.933 QALYs, versus 8.997 QALYs with SMBG, corresponding to a 0.937 QALY gain with rt-CGM. Total costs in the rt-CGM arm were EUR 2347 higher with rt-CGM versus SMBG (EUR 125,365 versus EUR 123,017). The base case incremental cost-utility ratio was therefore EUR 2506 per QALY gained, substantially lower than the WTP threshold of EUR 30,000 per QALY. The analysis also projected a reduction in cumulative incidence of ophthalmic, renal, neurological, and cardiovascular events in rt-CGM users, with reductions of 16.03%, 13.07%, 7.34%, and 9.09%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared to SMBG, rt-CGM is highly likely to be a cost-effective intervention for patients living with insulin-treated T2D in Spain.

© 2024 Merino-Torres et al.

Keywords

• CGM; continuous glucose monitoring; cost-effectiveness; health economics; hypoglycaemia; type 2 diabetes