Association of ventilation volumes, pressures and rates with the mechanical power of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: exploring the impact of rate reduction.

Autores de IIS La Fe

• Guido Mazzinari

  Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

• Buiteman-Kruizinga LA
• van Meenen DMP
• Serpa Neto A
• Bos LDJ
• van der Heiden PLJ
• Paulus F
• Schultz MJ
• NEBULAE
• PReVENT
• RELAx
• investigators

Grupos

• Medicina Perioperatoria, Anestesiología y Reanimación

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: High mechanical power is associated with mortality in patients who are critically ill and require invasive ventilation. It remains uncertain which components of mechanical power - volume, pressure or rate - increase mechanical power the most. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a database containing individual patient data from three randomised clinical trials of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary endpoint was mechanical power. We used linear regression; double stratification to create subgroups of participants; and mediation analysis to assess the impact of changes in volumes, pressures and rates on mechanical power. RESULTS: A total of 1732 patients were included and analysed. The median (IQR [range]) mechanical power was 12.3 (9.3-17.1 [3.7-50.1]) J.min(-1). In linear regression, respiratory rate (36%) and peak pressure (51%) explained most of the increase in mechanical power. Increasing quintiles of peak pressure stratified on constant levels of respiratory rate resulted in higher risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 2.2 (95%CI 1.8-2.6), p < 0.01), while decreasing quintiles of respiratory rate stratified on constant levels of peak pressure resulted in lower risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 0.2 (95%CI 0.2-0.3), p < 0.01). Mediation analysis showed that a reduction in respiratory rate, with the increase in tidal volume, partially mediates an effect of reduction in mechanical power (average causal mediation effect -0.10, 95%CI -0.12 to -0.09, p < 0.01), but still with a direct effect of tidal volume on mechanical power (average direct effect 0.15, 95%CI 0.11-0.19, p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: In this cohort of patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome, pressure and respiratory rate were the most important determinants of mechanical power. The respiratory rate may be the most attractive ventilator setting to adjust when targeting a lower mechanical power.

© 2025 The Author(s). Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.

Keywords

• driving pressure; lung-protective ventilation; mechanical power; mechanical ventilation; respiratory rate