Delphi consensus statement for understanding and managing the subcostal hernia: subcostal hernias collaborative report (scholar study).

Autores de IIS La Fe

• José Bueno Lledó

  Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

• Baig, S J
• Kulkarni, G V
• Priya, P
• Afaque, M Y
• Chintapatla, S
• de Beaux, A
• Gandhi, J A
• Urena, M A Garcia
• Hammond, T M
• Lomanto, D
• Liu, R
• Mehta, A
• Miserez, M
• Montgomery, A
• Morales-Conde, S
• Palanivelu, C
• Pauli, E M
• Rege, S A
• Renard, Y
• Rosen, M
• Sanders, D L
• Singhal, V K
• Slade, D A J
• Warren, O J
• Wijerathne, S

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Subcostal hernias are categorized as L1 based on the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification and frequently involve M1, M2, and L2 sites. These are common after hepatopancreatic and biliary surgeries. The literature on subcostal hernias mostlycomprises ofretrospective reviews of small heterogenous cohorts, unsurprisingly leading to no consensus or guidelines. Given the limited literature and lack of consensus or guidelines for dealing with these hernias, we planned for a Delphi consensus to aid in decision making to repair subcostal hernias. METHODS: We adopted a modified Delphi technique to establish consensus regarding the definition, characteristics, and surgical aspects of managing subcostal hernias (SCH). It was a four-phase Delphi study reflecting the widely accepted model, consisting of: 1. Creating a query. 2. Building an expert panel. 3. Executing the Delphi rounds. 4. Analysing, presenting, and reporting the Delphi results. More than 70% of agreement was defined as a consensus statement. RESULTS: The 22 experts who agreed to participate in this Delphi process for Subcostal Hernias (SCH) comprised 7 UK surgeons, 6 mainland European surgeons, 4 Indians, 3 from the USA, and 2 from Southeast Asia. This Delphi study on subcostal hernias achieved consensus on the following areas-use of mesh in elective cases; the retromuscular position with strong discouragement for onlay mesh; use of macroporous medium-weight polypropylene mesh; use of the subcostal incision over midline incision if there is no previous midline incision; TAR over ACST; defect closure where MAS is used; transverse suturing over vertical suturing for closure of circular defects; and use of peritoneal flap when necessary. CONCLUSION: This Delphi consensus defines subcostal hernias and gives insight into theconsensus for incision, dissection plane, mesh placement, mesh type, and mesh fixation for these hernias.

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

• Subcostal hernia; Ventral hernia; Complex hernia; L1 hernia; Delphi consensus