Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Fecha de publicación: Fecha Ahead of Print:

Autores de IIS La Fe

  • Carlos Saus Ortega

    Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

  • Villalba-Nicolau, Marcela
  • Chover-Sierra, Elena
  • Ballestar-Tarín ML
  • Chover-Sierra, Pilar
  • Martinez-Sabater, Antonio

Grupos

Abstract

Canalization of vascular accesses is one of the most used techniques in hospitalization units. When talking about peripherally inserted catheters, we can differentiate between peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVC), midline catheters, and long peripheral catheters (LPC). Midline catheters are rarely used despite being recommended for intravenous therapies lasting more than six days. This research is a pilot study of a longitudinal clinical trial. It aims to compare the complications associated with intravenous therapy between the control group (CG) with a PIVC and the experimental group (EG) with a midline in an Internal Medicine Unit of a Spanish hospital for three months. In this study, 44 subjects participated, 25 in the CG and 19 in the EG. The duration of cannulation was longer in the experimental group (8.13 days vs. 3.22, p < 0.001), and the appearance of phlebitis was more significant in the control group (19 patients in CG and 25 patients in EG). Midlines have presented a longer duration of cannulation and fewer complications than the PIVC. This protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05512117).

Datos de la publicación

ISSN/ISSNe:
2039-439X, 2039-4403

Nursing Reports  MDPI

Tipo:
Article
Páginas:
814-823
PubMed:
36412798
Factor de Impacto:
0,112 SCImago
Cuartil:
Q4 SCImago

Citas Recibidas en Web of Science: 6

Documentos

  • No hay documentos

Métricas

Filiaciones mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • catheter-related infections; midline catheter; patient safety; peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC); phlebitis

Cita

Compartir