Screening Clinical Changes for the Diagnosis of Early Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Autores de IIS La Fe

• Ana Alabajos Cea

  Autor

• Luz Maria Herrero Manley

  Autor

• Juan Alonso Pérez-Baquero

  Autor

• Enrique Viosca Herrero

  Autor

• Isabel Vázquez Arce

  Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

• Suso-Marti, Luis
• Sempere-Rubio, Nuria
• Cuenca-Martinez, Ferran
• Munoz-Alarcos, Vicente

Grupos

• Medicina Física y Rehabilitación

  Investigador Principal

  Isabel Vázquez Arce

Abstract

Background: The main objective was to evaluate differences in the clinical, motor, or functional variables in patients with Early Osteoarthritis (EOA) and individuals at risk of developing osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed. All the participants were divided into two groups: EOA patients and healthy subjects (HS) at risk of developing OA. The main outcomes were clinical tests, such as those of knee morphology, instability, or proprioception; motor and functional variables, such as knee strength, range of motion, walking speed, and the sit-to-stand test; pain and disability, assessed through the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) scales; and knee alignment and leg length inequality, assessed via X-ray images. Results: A total of 97 participants were included (54 EOA and 43 HS). Patients with EOA showed a greater presence of knee pain (p < 0.01). In addition, more EOA patients showed instability both in the left (p < 0.01) and right legs (p < 0.05). Regarding the knee alignment variable, significant differences were found (p < 0.04), with more patients with EOA diagnosed as possessing a varus alignment. In addition, EOA patients showed lower knee strength, since statistically significant differences were found regarding flexion and extension strength in the left leg (Mean Difference (MD): 12.92; p = 0.03; d = -0.46 and MD:7.81; p = 0.04; d = -0.39). Differences were found for the sit-to-stand test scores, showing lower results for the EOA group (MD: -1.91; p < 0.01; d = 0.54). Conclusions: The results of this research show statistically significant differences between patients with EOA and HS at risk of developing OA with respect to pain, disability, instability, knee strength, and the sit-to-stand test. Our results suggest that the evaluation of clinical, motor, and functional features could contribute to an early management of knee OA.

Keywords

• osteoarthritis; knee osteoarthritis; early osteoarthritis; musculoskeletal disorders; risk factors