National survey of colorectal surgery units on abdominal wall closure.

Autores de IIS La Fe

• Salvador Pous Serrano

  Autor

• José Bueno Lledó

  Autor

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

• García-Pastor P

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to assess the current status and knowledge of the Spanish colorectal surgeons on the wall closure. METHODS: A single answer questionnaire of 25 closed questions was conducted using specific software for online surveys that was distributed to a cohort of colorectal surgeons. RESULTS: 53 surgeons replied to the survey. The vast majority prefer a closure of the midlaparotomy with a very slow absorbing monofilament (67.92%) continuous suture (96.23%) in a single plane (81.13%). Mass stitches, retention systems, and loop sutures continue to be used. The most commonly used suture gauge was USP 1 (United States Pharmacopeia) (58.49%). The most commonly used needle is with a cylindrical body and a trocar tip. Only 50%, routinely perform wall closure after placement of a trocar equal to or greater than 10 mm. Almost everyone knows the 4:1 rule and thinks it should be applied, but the small bites technique is not performed. 50% would never place a prophylactic prosthesis. The closure is usually performed by the same surgeon who has performed the entire procedure. One out of five confesses not knowing the rate of incisional hernias in his unit. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of consensus and basic knowledge regarding the technical aspects of closure and the prevention of the appearance of incisional hernias. The use of slow absorbing monofilament continuous suture in a single plane seems well accepted.

Copyright © 2022 AEC. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Keywords

• Abdominal wall closure; Cierre laparotómico; Cierre pared abdominal; Encuesta; Hernia incisional; Incisional hernia; Laparotomy closure; Malla profiláctica; Prophylactic mesh; Survey