Microscopic versus endoscopic pituitary surgery
Autores de IIS La Fe
Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe
- Pancucci G
Grupos
Abstract
Introduction and objective: The endoscopic techniques used in pituitary surgery have evolved greatly in recent years. Our objective in this study was to conduct a review of the systematic reviews published in the English language literature, to examine their consistency and conclusions reached following studies comparing microsurgery and endoscopic surgery in hypophyseal surgery. Materials and methods: We carried out a bibliographic search on MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases, selecting those systematic reviews and meta-analyses published from the year 2000 until January 2013, focusing on comparisons between microsurgical and endoscopic techniques. Results: We concluded with type A consistency that hospital stay was shorter and diabetes insipidus and rhinological complications were less frequent in the endoscopy group. We concluded with type B consistency that lower rates of patient blood loss, shorter operative times, higher rate of gross total resection, lesser association to visual impairment and lower rate of hypopituitarism were observed in the endoscopy group. Vascular complications and cerebrospinal fluid fistulas were reduced with microsurgery. It is crucial to perform a combined analysis of all the systematic reviews treating a specific topic, observing and analysing the trends and how these are affected by new contributions. Conclusion: Randomized multicenter studies are necessary to resolve the controversy over endoscopic and microsurgical approaches in hypophyseal pathology. (C) 2013 Sociedad Espanola de Neurocirugia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
Datos de la publicación
- ISSN/ISSNe:
- 1130-1473, 2340-6305
- Tipo:
- Review
- Páginas:
- 170-178
- PubMed:
- 24747035
- Factor de Impacto:
- 0,188 SCImago ℠
- Cuartil:
- Q3 SCImago ℠
NEUROCIRUGIA ELSEVIER DOYMA SL
Citas Recibidas en Web of Science: 6
Documentos
- No hay documentos
Filiaciones
Keywords
- Pituitary adenoma; Microscopic surgery; Endoscopic surgery
Proyectos y Estudios Clínicos
ENSAYO PARA COMPARAR LA EFICACIA Y LA SEGURIDAD DE INSULINA DEGLUDEC/LIRAGLUTIDA FRENTE A INSULINA GLARGINA EN SUJETOS CON DIABETES MELLITUS DE TIPO 2.
Investigador Principal: JUAN FRANCISCO MERINO TORRES
NN9068-3952 . 2013
ESTUDIO ABIERTO, MULTICENTRICO, DE ACCESO EXPANDIDO DE PASIREOTIDA S.C., EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD DE CUSHING
Investigador Principal: ROSA CÁMARA GÓMEZ
CSOM230B2406 . 2011
ESTUDIO MUNDIAL SOBRE EL CONTROL Y LAS COMPLICACIONES DEL HIPOTITUITARISMO (HYPOCCS).
Investigador Principal: JUAN FRANCISCO MERINO TORRES
B9R-MC-GDGA . 2011
Cita
Simal JA,Miranda P,Pancucci G,Evangelista R,Pérez P,Sanromán P,Cámara R,Botella C. Microscopic versus endoscopic pituitary surgery. Neurocirugia. 2014. 25(4):p. 170-178. IF:0,293. (4).