Predicting Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis: Performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and Development of a New Prognostic Model.

Fecha de publicación: Fecha Ahead of Print:

Autores de IIS La Fe

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

  • Hernández-Boluda JC
  • Pereira A
  • Alvarez-Larran A
  • Martín AA
  • Benzaquen A
  • Aguirre L
  • González P
  • Mora J
  • Dorado N
  • Sampol A
  • García-Gutiérrez V
  • López-Godino O
  • Fox ML
  • Reguera JL
  • Pérez-Encinas M
  • Pascual MJ
  • Xicoy B
  • Parody R
  • González-Pinedo L
  • Español I
  • Avendaño A
  • Correa JG
  • Vallejo C
  • Jurado M
  • García-Cadenas I
  • Osorio S
  • Durán MA
  • Sánchez-Guijo F
  • Cervantes F

Grupos

Abstract

Accurate prognostic tools are crucial to assess the risk/benefit ratio of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) and identify risk factors for survival in a multicenter series of 197 patients with MF undergoing allo-HCT. After a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 47% of patients had died, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 51%. Projected 5-year risk of nonrelapse mortality and relapse incidence was 30% and 20%, respectively. Factors independently associated with increased mortality were a hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) =3 and receiving a graft from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor or cord blood, whereas post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) was associated with improved survival. Donor type was the only parameter included in the MTSS model with independent prognostic value for survival. According to the MTSS, 3-year survival was 62%, 66%, 37%, and 17% for low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk groups, respectively. By pooling together the low- and intermediate-risk groups, as well as the high- and very high-risk groups, we pinpointed 2 categories: standard risk and high risk (25% of the series). Three-year survival was 62% in standard-risk and 25% in high-risk categories (P < .001). We derived a risk score based on the 3 independent risk factors for survival in our series (donor type, HCT-CI, and PT-Cy). The corresponding 5-year survival for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories was 79%, 55%, and 32%, respectively (P < .001). In conclusion, the MTSS model failed to clearly delineate 4 prognostic groups in our series but may still be useful to identify a subset of patients with poor outcome. We provide a simple prognostic scoring system for risk/benefit considerations before transplantation in patients with MF.

Datos de la publicación

ISSN/ISSNe:
1083-8791, 1523-6536

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION  ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC

Tipo:
Article
Páginas:
2237-2244
PubMed:
32717433
Factor de Impacto:
2,301 SCImago
Cuartil:
Q1 SCImago

Citas Recibidas en Web of Science: 27

Documentos

  • No hay documentos

Métricas

Filiaciones mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • Myelofibrosis, Prognostication, Risk factors, Survival, Transplantation

Cita

Compartir