Benefit of primary percutaneous coronary interventions in the elderly with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Fecha de publicación:

Autores de IIS La Fe

Participantes ajenos a IIS La Fe

  • Fernandez-Berges, D
  • Degano, IR
  • Fernandez, RG
  • Subirana, I
  • Vila, J
  • Jimenez-Navarro, M
  • Perez-Fernandez, S
  • Roque, M
  • Bayes-Genis, A
  • Fernandez-Aviles, F
  • Mayorga, A
  • Bertomeu-Gonzalez, V
  • Sanchis, J
  • Esteban, MR
  • Sanchez-Hidalgo, A
  • Sanchez-Insa, E
  • Elorriaga, A
  • Abu Assi, E
  • Nunez, A
  • Ruiz, JMG
  • Valdeolmillos, PM
  • Bosch-Portell, D
  • Lekuona, I
  • Carrillo-Lopez, A
  • Zamora, A
  • Vega-Hernandez, B
  • Serrano, JA
  • Rubert, C
  • Ruiz-Valdepenas, L
  • Quintas, L
  • Rodriguez-Padial, L
  • Vaquero, J
  • Barrabes, JA
  • Sanchez, PL
  • Sionis, A
  • Marti-Almor, J
  • Elosua, R
  • Lidon, RM
  • Garcia-Dorado, D
  • Marrugat, J

Grupos

Abstract

Objective Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) has demonstrated its efficacy in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, patients with STEMI >= 75 years receive less P-PCI than younger patients despite their higher in-hospital morbimortality. The objective of this analysis was to determine the effectiveness of P-PCI in patients with STEMI >= 75 years. Methods We included 979 patients with STEMI >= 75 years, from the ATencion HOspitalaria del Sindrome coronario study, a registry of 8142 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome admitted at 31 Spanish hospitals in 2014-2016. We calculated a propensity score (PS) for the indication of P-PCI. Patients that received or not P-PCI were matched by PS. Using logistic regression, we compared the effectiveness of performing P-PCI versus non-performance for the composite primary event, which included death, reinfarction, acute pulmonary oedema or cardiogenic shock during hospitalisation. Results Of the included patients, 81.5 % received P-PCI. The matching provided two groups of 169 patients with and without P-PCI. Compared with its non-performance, P-PCI presented a composite event OR adjusted by PS of 0.55 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.89). Conclusions Receiving a P-PCI was significantly associated with a reduced risk of major intrahospital complications in patients with STEMI aged 75 years or older.

Datos de la publicación

ISSN/ISSNe:
2053-3624,

Open Heart  BMJ Publishing Group

Tipo:
Article
Páginas:
-
PubMed:
32747454
Factor de Impacto:
1,050 SCImago
Cuartil:
Q1 SCImago

Citas Recibidas en Web of Science: 4

Documentos

  • No hay documentos

Métricas

Filiaciones mostrar / ocultar

Keywords

  • coronary intervention (PCI); stemi; acute coronary syndrome

Compartir